Bugs & Cranks Home
Bugs & Cranks
July 24, 2008 at 3:21 am ET
4 Comments
Bonds Vs. Ruth Part IV: The Final Five Seasons

Back in February, Ed Valentine and I got into a debate over who was better — Babe Ruth or The G-POPE Barry Bonds. In a four-part series with the help of WhatIfSports.com, Bugs & Cranks hopes to add new perspective to the debate….

The idea is to switch these two all-time greats in time — what if Bonds quantum leaped into Ruth’s place on the Red Sox and Yankees teams of the 1910’s-1930’s? what if Ruth replaced Bonds on the Pirates and Giants of the past 21 years?

We’ve previously posted the results of seasons 1-6, 7-12. and 13-17. And now the stunning conclusion, seasons 18-22….

Season Eighteen

In 1931, for the first time Barry Bonds and his Yankees begin a season as defending World Champions. Bonds doesn’t put up the huge numbers he had the year before — hitting only 24 home runs after blasting a career-high 47 in 1930 — but he does finish second in the AL batting race, third in SLG, and leads the bigs in OBP. Ruth’s Yankees had finished third in 1930, and while his version won 94 games in 1931, they still finished 13.5 back of the Philadelphia Athletics. With Bonds, and presumably all of his extra walks and fewer outs, his Yankees break Major League records for wins (118) and winning percentage (.766 — besting the 116 and .763 marks set by the 1906 Cubs). They win their second straight pennant by 23 games.

Wins Diff
1931 Yankees w/ Ruth 94
1931 Yankees w/ Bonds 118 +24
2003 Giants w/ Bonds 100
2003 Giants w/ Ruth 88 -12

In 2003, Babe Ruth’s numbers are also down by his standards, but they’re enough to give The Bambino his second-straight Triple Crown, and the seventh of his career. Most of Ruth’s numbers are close to what Bonds produced with the ’03 Giants, but Ruth nearly doubles Bonds’ 2003 RBI total. Perhaps with records already long-broken, opposing managers and pitchers were more willing to pitch to Ruth, or Ruth was more willing to swing freely. In any case, Ruth’s Giants win 12 fewer games than their Bonds-led counterparts who won the NL West by 15 games, but Ruth’s Giants still win enough games to win their fifth-straight division crown.

AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Bonds, 1931 Yankees .353 24 108 .560 .619
Bonds, 2003 Giants .341 45 90 .529 .749
Ruth, 2003 Giants .350 60 177 .498 .732
Ruth, 1931 Yankees .373 46 163 .495 .700

Bonds and the Yankees open the 1931 World Series at Yankee Stadium, and win two close ballgames (6-4, 4-2). In Game 3 on the road, Barry’s Yankees are outslugged 13-8, but they dominate the next two games, winning 8-2 and 8-1 to take their second-straight World Championship. (Ruth’s Yankees didn’t make the Series in either 1930 or 1931, and they only won back-to-back titles once — 1927-28.)

The Bonds-version of the 2003 Giants lost their opening series to Florida Marlins, the Wild Card and eventual World Series winners. With fewer regular season wins, Ruth’s Giants draw the Atlanta Braves instead. For the fourth time in six years, Ruth and the Giants beat the Braves in the NLDS, this time with a convincing 12-4 Game 5 victory in Atlanta. Facing the Marlins in the NLCS, the Giants split the first two at home, then win the first game in Miami before losing the next two to return to San Francisco with a 3-2 deficit. Ruth and the Giants win Game 6 15-9, and then dominate Game 7, winning 8-0 to head back to Seattle for a rematch of the 2002 World Series. Ruth and the Giants haven’t forgotten last year’s defeat in 6 games, and go into Safeco Field and pound the Mariners in Game One, 12-0, and take the second game as well (4-2). With a chance to take a commanding lead back in San Francisco, the Giants lose Game 3, 10-6. The Mariners then edge the Giants in Game 4 and Game 5, winning both games by 4-3 scores. When the Series resumes in Seattle, Ruth’s Giants force a Game 7 with a 7-6 win. For the first time in his career, Babe Ruth is one game away from being a World Series champion. In Game 7, The Babe and the Giants put up 4 runs, but it’s not enough — with a 6-4 win, the Mariners win their second-straight title.

Postseason Stats G AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Bonds, 1931 Yankees 5 .294 1 7 .500 .529
Bonds, 2003 Giants 4 .222 0 2 .556 .333
Ruth, 2003 Giants 19 .384 5 19 .516 .658

Season Nineteen

In 2004, Babe Ruth of the two-time defending National League Champion Giants again hits 60 home runs, his unprecedented seventh-straight season with 60 or more homers. He also leads the NL in RBI, although David Ortiz and Miguel Tejada drive in more runs in the AL, but he is not a factor in the race for the NL batting crown. Ruth hits more home runs and drives in more home runs than Bonds had with the same team, but his batting average, OBP and SLG are all significantly lower than what Bonds posted in 2004. With Barry Bonds, the 2004 Giants won 91 games and missed the playoffs by a single game. The Ruth version of the 2004 Giants not only miss the playoffs, they don’t even manage a winning record.

AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Bonds, 1932 Yankees .372 25 129 .631 .666
Bonds, 2004 Giants .362 45 101 .609 .812
Ruth, 2004 Giants .315 60 136 .467 .682
Ruth, 1932 Yankees .341 41 137 .489 .661

In 1932 for the two-time defending champion Yankees, Bonds wins his second batting title at the age of 40. Bonds also breaks the MLB OBP record he set two years earlier. (This probably gets overlooked as, according to Baseball Almanac, Branch Rickey and Alan Roth created the OBP statistic in the 1950’s — perhaps, though, Barry’s incredible season of getting on-base in over 63% of his appearances would have accelerated its invention.) Bonds also has the Major’s second-best SLG, behind only Jimmie Foxx. With Babe Ruth, the 1932 Yankees won 107 games and their first pennant since 1928. With Bonds, the 1932 Yankees won 112 games, winning their third-straight pennant by 23 games.

Wins Diff
1932 Yankees w/ Ruth 107
1932 Yankees w/ Bonds 112 +5
2004 Giants w/ Bonds 91
2004 Giants w/ Ruth 79 -12

While Ruth’s 1932 Yankees swept their way to a World Series title, the Bonds version of the team drops the opening game of the World Series at Yankee Stadium. They recover with a 10-9 victory in Game 2, and win big in Game 3 on the road (11-3). A one-run loss in Game 4 evens the Series, but the Yankee bats power a 13-8 win in Game 5 to give the bombers a chance to end the Series at home in Game 6. Game 6 is a back-and-forth slugfest. In the bottom of the 9th inning, the game is tied 8-8, and Bonds comes to the plate. Bonds has had a huge series already, batting over .500, and making an out in less than a quarter of his plate appearances, but he hasn’t homered. Bonds comes to the plate and points to the short right field porch in Yankee Stadium. On the first pitch, he homers to right-center and earns his third-straight World Series title. (With Ruth, the Yankees won three consecutive pennants on two occasions, but they never won three consecutive World Series.)

Postseason Stats G AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Bonds, 1932 Yankees 6 .600 1 7 .760 1.067
Ruth, 1932 Yankees 4 .333 2 6 .500 .733

Season Twenty

In 1933, a series of knee injuries keep Barry Bonds out of all but 35 games. Bonds is fairly productive in those games, mainly hitting for average. While the Babe Ruth 1933 Yankees had won 91 games and finished second, the Bonds version wins two more games and their fourth-straight pennant.

Wins Diff
1933 Yankees w/ Ruth 91
1933 Yankees w/ Bonds 93 +2
2005 Giants w/ Bonds 75
2005 Giants w/ Ruth 90

In 2005, a re-dedicated 38-year-old Babe Ruth leads the Majors in home runs, RBI, OBP and SLG, and finishes third in the NL batting race. With Bonds not appearing until mid-September, the 2005 Giants remained in a very weak NL West race until the last week, but finished with a losing record. With another dominant season from Ruth, those same Giants return to the postseason after a one-year absence, winning 90 games and their sixth division title in seven years.

AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Bonds, 1933 Yankees .317 0 8 .379 .383
Bonds, 2005 Giants .286 5 10 .404 .667
Ruth, 2005 Giants .324 64 158 .459 .690
Ruth, 1933 Yankees .301 34 103 .442 .582

Barry Bonds makes only one appearance in the 1933 World Series as his Yankees take on their former parkmates, the New York Giants. After the Yankees win the first two games at the Polo Grounds, Bonds comes on as a pinch-hitter in Game 3 at Yankee Stadium. Entering to a huge ovation, Bonds singles in only at-bat of the Series. The Yankees win the game, and go on to sweep away the Giants and claim their fourth consecutive championship. (This equals the amount of World Series the Yankees won with Ruth.)

Back in 2005, Ruth and the Giants finish off the Cardinals in a four-game Division Series. Facing the Phillies in the NLCS, Ruth and the Giants win the first game in Philadelphia, 11-5. After dropping the second game in Philadelphia, the Giants return home and get outslugged in Game 3, 10-8, and then lose another close game in Game 4. Facing elimination in Game 5, Ruth and his Giants are shut down by Brett Myers, losing 3-0.

Postseason Stats G AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Bonds, 1933 Yankees 1 1.000 0 0 1.000 1.000
Ruth, 2005 Giants 9 .278 3 10 .364 .583

Season Twenty-One

In 2006, Babe Ruth’s numbers finally start to fall back to Earth. For the first time since 1997, he does not lead his league in home runs — Ryan Howard finishes with 11 more home runs than the Bambino. Ruth does lead the Majors in OBP, but his other stats fall short of what’s he’s done in the past. Ruth talks of retirement and wanting to manage, but it seems unlikely any club would hand over the reins to a rookie manager. With Bonds in 2006, the same Giants finished with another losing record. Ruth’s 2006 Giants win 95 games en route to a second-straight division title, their seventh division crown in eight years and their eighth postseason appearance in nine years.

Wins Diff
1934 Yankees w/ Ruth 94
1934 Yankees w/ Bonds 100 +6
2006 Giants w/ Bonds 76
2006 Giants w/ Ruth 95 +19

Back in 1934, Barry Bonds comes back healthy and is a major part of the Yankees’ quest for their fifth-straight pennant. Bonds again leads the bigs in OBP, and his 1934 RBI total is 22 better than what Ruth did with the same team. Barry’s other numbers are very close to Ruth’s 1934 stats. And while Ruth’s 1934 Yankees finished a distant second, 7.5 games back, the Bonds version was locked in a very tight pennant race with the Detroit Tigers. Entering the season’s final weekend, Bonds and the Yanks are 2 games back, but a win and a Tiger loss pulls them within a single game. On Saturday, the Yankees win, but so does Detroit. On the final Sunday, Bonds and the Yankees win their 100th game of the season, giving them their fourth season with 100 or more wins in a five-year span. The victory though is bittersweet as later in the day, the Tigers win their 101st game and the American League pennant. Throughout the season, news increases of a growing rift between Bonds and Yankees manager Joe McCarthy. After the final game, many speculate it will be Bonds’ final game as a Yankee.

AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Bonds, 1934 Yankees .270 18 106 .480 .470
Bonds, 2006 Giants .270 26 77 .454 .545
Ruth, 2006 Giants .314 47 123 .453 .643
Ruth, 1934 Yankees .288 22 84 .448 .537

Realizing it may be his last chance at a ring, Babe Ruth and the Giants put on a spectacular offensive show in the NLDS, sweeping the Brewers and winning the three games by a combined score of 30-5. As the NLCS started against the Mets, runs were much harder to come by. The Giants managed to eke out a 2-1 victory in Game 1 in San Francisco, but John Maine shut out Ruth and the rest of the Giants as the Mets took Game 2, 5-0. The Giants prevailed in another low-scoring affair in Game 3 at Shea, 3-1. The Mets came back to win Game 4, 5-3, and then were led by Tom Glavine to a 2-1 win in Game 5. Facing elimination back in San Francisco, the Giant bats finally woke up. Ruth and the Giants enjoyed a lopsided 7-0 Game 6 win, and then followed it up with a convincing 8-3 victory in Game 7. The 2006 World Series could hardly have gotten off to a more inauspicious start for Babe Ruth and the Giants. The Twins came into San Francisco for the opening game and routed the Giants, 16-0. Ruth tried to rally his team in Game 2, but they fell again, this time 8-5. The games in Minnesota were no closer, as the Twins limited Ruth and the Giants to a combined 3 runs on their way to a World Series sweep. Ruth said after Game 4 that he had considered retiring, but that he couldn’t go out on this note and he would return for at least one more season.

Postseason Stats G AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Ruth, 2006 Giants 14 .400 2 5 .520 .700

Season Twenty-Two

While the offseason signing of Barry Zito gives some fans hope that the Giants finally have the last piece to give them a championship, there are many other distractions for Babe Ruth before pitchers and catchers report. Some expect him to be named in the Mitchell Report, but his name does not appear. Other commentators say that regardless of whether Ruth ever took performance-enhancing drugs, The Babe is perhaps most responsible for the scandal because it seemed like drugs were the only way players like Sosa and McGwire could come close to his offensive numbers. Ruth also storms off the set of The Late Show with David Letterman when Jim Kelly makes a surprise appearance. Jaded by the accusations and insinuations, and crushed by his latest World Series defeat, Ruth — never one for much conditioning anyway — drinks heavily and comes to spring training very heavy. In spring training and the first month of the season, it becomes clear Ruth is virtually useless in the field. He quickly squashes any talk of a trade to an AL team that could use him as a DH, and is limited to mostly pinch-hitting duty. In mid-summer, the Giants go to Pittsburgh to play the Pirates. Ruth’s average is near the mendoza line, and he has only 7 home runs for the year. Facing the team he began his career with, Ruth gets a rare start in right and puts on one last show, hitting three tape-measure home runs. After the game, Ruth holds an impromptu press conference and announces his retirement. Many find the sudden retirement of a legend sad, but others, especially blog writers and commenters find plenty of ammunition in Ruth’s lack of titles, his possible PED use, his physique and his drinking. ESPN devotes 48 hours of programming on all five of its networks to covering Ruth’s retirement. ESPN also reportedly offers Ruth an eight-figure contract, hoping to use him on Baseball Tonight and pair him in a reality show with John Kruk, but Ruth turns it down. Another rumor has Ruth trying to buy the Florida Marlins and having a rule change to allow owner-managers. These 2007 Giants finish a distant third in the NL West, but do finish the year with a winning record.

AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Bonds, 1935 Braves .301 20 62 .519 .507
Bonds, 2007 Giants .276 28 66 .480 .565
Ruth, 2007 Giants .228 10 25 .456 .608
Ruth, 1935 Braves .181 6 12 .359 .431

In February of 1935, the Yankees trade Barry Bonds to the National League’s Boston Braves. The city is thrilled by the return of the great Barry Bonds, even though he’s joining the city’s second team and the Braves are coming off a fourth-place finish, 16 games behind St. Louis. In his first and only season in the NL, Bonds puts up respectable numbers, finishing the year batting over .300 with 20 home runs, and posting the second-best OBP in the bigs. Still, the 1935 Braves with Ruth had the third-worst winning percentage in MLB history. With Bonds, they’re not that awful, but they do finish in last place and lose over 100 games. Near the end of the season, financial problems cause a change in ownership, and with a week left in the season Bonds is told he won’t be back with the team next year. Bonds declares he wants to play again in 1936, but receives no offers from any of the 16 Major League teams. Bonds and many others suspect he’s been blacklisted by Commissioner Landis, but it’s decades before this is proven conclusively.

Wins Diff
1935 Braves w/ Ruth 38
1935 Yankees w/ Bonds 50 +12
2007 Giants w/ Bonds 71
2007 Giants w/ Ruth 83 +12

Career Stats

Career Stats AB AVG HR RBI SB OBP SLG
Bonds, 1914-1935 10419 .324 442 2339 460 .468 .542
Bonds, 1986-2007 9847 .298 762 1996 514 .444 .607
Ruth, Ruth, 1986-2007 12817 .348 1256 3078 3 .481 .805
Ruth, 1914-1935 8399 .342 714 2213 123 .474 .690

  • Bonds’s career batting average was 25 points higher in our experiment, and would place him 44th all-time. Ruth’s career average from 1986-2007 would place him 5th all-time (up from 10th for his “original” career).
  • Bonds’ 442 career home runs would place him in a tie with Dave Kingman for 34th all-time (down from 1st). Ruth’s 1256 would put him in 1st, with 501 more than Henry Aaron.
  • Bonds’ 2339 RBI would be better than Ruth’s totals for the same time period (though with the advantage of Ruth spending four years as primarily a pitcher), and would be the Major League record for six decades until Ruth breaks it as a Giant. Henry Aaron is the only other player to ever drive in 2000+ RBI.
  • Bonds’ 460 1914-1935 stolen bases would drop him from 32nd all-time to 47th (and with exactly one less steal than his father, Bobby Bonds, who stole 461).
  • Bonds’s 1914-1935 OBP would move him from 6th to 3rd all-time. Ruth would stay at 2nd all-time, but would be even closer to Ted Williams’ career record of .482.
  • Bonds’ 1914-1935 SLG would drop him from 6th to 34th. Ruth would still own the career SLG mark, but his lead over Ted Williams would balloon from 56 points to 171.
Postseason Career Stats Games AB AVG HR RBI OBP SLG
Bonds, 1914-1935 23 72 .319 7 23 .519 .694
Bonds, 1986-2007 48 151 .245 9 24 .433 .503
Ruth, 1986-2007 92 311 .341 31 80 .466 .695
Ruth, 1914-1935 41 129 .326 15 13 .467 .744
  • Bonds’ 7 World Series home runs with the Yankees would place him in a tie for 10th on the all-time career World Series list. Babe Ruth’s 33 postseason home runs as a Giant would be a career postseason record (9 more than Manny Ramirez’s 24).
  • Bonds’ 24 World Series RBI would be tied for 8th all-time. Ruth’s 80 postseason RBI would tie Bernie Williams’ Major League record.
  • Bonds’ OBP in five World Series with the Yankees would set career World Series and postseason records. Ruth’s postseason OBP with the Giants would place him 9th all-time (down from 8th).
  • Bonds’ SLG would be the 7th-best career World Series mark.
Team Win Differential
Bonds, 1914-1935 +14
Ruth, 1986-2007 -25

  • In terms of regular season team wins, Bonds comes out ahead by a slim margin — an average of about 1.5 games per season.
  • When it comes to titles, Ruth’s teams won seven World Series and ten pennants over his career — he was 3-0 in World Series with the Red Sox, and 4-3 in World Series as a Yankee. With those same teams, Bonds won four World Series and five pennants, all with the Yankees. (The one World Series loss was in 1927, a year Ruth’s team won the Series. Three of Bonds’ World Series wins came in years that the team did not win the pennant with Ruth.)
  • Bonds made the playoffs seven times in his career. The Pirates won the NL East three times in his last three years in Pittsburgh, losing in the NLCS each time. The Giants won three division titles and one wild card with Bonds, losing three times in the NLDS, and winning the NL pennant once. With Ruth, the Pirates never made the playoffs, but Ruth leads the Giants to seven division titles and eight playoff appearances. The Giants also go deeper into the playoffs with Ruth, appearing in 7 NL Championship Series and 4 World Series.

Before we leave you, a final thought from Paul Bessire of WhatIfSports.com:

The most interesting thing about this exercise to me has been the affect on the two players’ teams. If the debate over which player is better can be answered by the question, who dominated more over his league (and would thus be most impressive in the other player’s era), the answer is clearly Ruth and most should have known that going into this project. But, if the more appropriate question is, who was more valuable to his team’s success, the line is blurred.

We hope you’ve enjoyed Bonds vs. Ruth. Feel free to leave praise and suggestions for future projects in the comments. And coming soon…. Aaron vs. Oh

Bonds vs. Ruth would not be possible without the help of Matt Mendelsohn and Paul Bessire of WhatIfSports.com. And it would be far less colorful without the graphic by B&C mastermind Jesse Pugh.

Read more: , ,
Print  |  Email  |  Share/Save
4 Responses to “Bonds Vs. Ruth Part IV: The Final Five Seasons”
  1. Doug TIM says:

    I straight up just don’t get it. How the hell does Ruth hit 1200 home runs – and end up 25 wins worse than Bonds?

  2. Stax says:

    Basically what Doug TIM said. What the heck was your methodology. How, once they were both playing the OF, can they BOTH have positive impacts on their teams? One replaces the other, meaning one is better than the other, meaning his performance will lead to more wins. Are you using Bill James’ definition of wins? Trying to extrapolate expected runs scored/allowed with these 2 and then doing Pythag wins? What exactly? Because saying that Ruth hits 500 more HR than Bonds on Bonds’ teams but they actually lose 25 more games is… Insane. Defense and speed is nice, but Barry Bonds could be Roberto Clemente, Willie Mays, and Rickey Henderson’s love child in terms of defense and speed and that wouldn’t overwhelm FIVE HUNDRED HOME RUNS.

  3. David Chalk says:

    We used WhatIfSports.com’s simulations — they simulated each season game-by-game.

    Theories that might explain the resulting difference in wins — defense and speed do probably factor in, but another factor might be that we did this year-by-year and that baseball is a team sport. 500 more home runs over 18 years (forgetting the pitching years) gives a team an average of 25-30 extra home runs per year. We wouldn’t expect a team getting one more player who’ll hit 25-30 home runs to dramatically alter a team’s wins and losses, so why would a guy hitting 100 home runs instead of 70 make a huge difference? I think it’s at least possible that most of the teams Bonds was on just weren’t very good — that even if we had increased some of Barry’s numbers 20% or so (which would get him up to what Ruth did in our sims), it wouldn’t have made a big difference in wins and losses. There’s also the “timeliness” of hitting to consider.

    To me though, the much more hare-to-believe thing is not that 1200 home runs wouldn’t mean more wins — look at A-Rod — but that Ruth would’ve been that much more dominant. I’m not familiar with all of the factors WhatIf uses in their simulations, but it seems obvious that a lot of weight is given to the idea that Ruth would’ve dominated in any other era to the degree he did in his own.

  4. James says:

    20-30 HRs might not make a difference as an individual player all that much (probably like 5-6ish WARP for a normal player at that level) but what’s important isn’t simply the 20-30 HRs but that they are being added ON TOP of what Bonds did. That is, when you are replacing one player with the other the only thing that changes in between those two teams are their performance. Thus, Ruth’s teams gain some speed, defense, and late-career performance but lose some power (given OPS+ and such) and pitching, and the inverse for Bonds teams. It seems crazy to me to suggest that 500 added home runs for Bonds teams would not be sufficient to outweigh the loss of some speed and defense to even win a single additional game.

    As for dominance across eras, you can start by looking at OPS+ (OPS/league average OPS, adjusted for park factors and such, times 100 so if you are exactly league average you are at 100). Bonds OPS over his career was 1.051, good for an OPS+ of 182. This means league average OPS over that span was .577. Ruth’s ACTUAL OPS was 1.164, already well above Bonds. However, given how much quieter the times were that gave him an OPS+ of 207. If you take that OPS+ and just apply it to modern numbers (so 2.07 * .577, league average for the length of Bonds’ career) you get a future-Ruth OPS of 1.194.

Leave a Reply

Our Sponsors
Vividseats.com is your premier internet destination for all MLB Baseball Tickets, such as Phillies Tickets, Cubs Tickets, LA Dodgers Tickets, Pirates Tickets, Marlins Tickets, and many more.
SecureYourSeat.com are able to provide you with a great selection of Premier League tickets including Arsenal tickets, Manchester United tickets, Liverpool tickets and Chelsea tickets. We also stock a fine selection of Champions League tickets including Champions League final tickets.
Best online sports betting bonuses and promotions at Sportsbetting.com. Join now the most secure online sportsbook!
For a selection of online slots games and casino reviews visit Online Slots Entertainment, a leader in online slot machines since 2003.
AllianceTickets.com carries all MLB Tickets including Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets and San Francisco Giants Tickets. They carry all Sports Tickets at discount prices.
With Texas Holdem Masters you can get information about the hottest trends in the popular Texas Holdem Poker game, with strategies and tricks so that you can be a master too. At Gambling Experts your poker skills will be upgraded from being an amateur to being an expert.

windows 7 key

windows 7 key

serial winzip 11

serial winzip 11 key

serial corel draw 11

serial corel draw 11 serials

photo shop key

photo shop key

free corel photoshop download

free corel photoshop download keygen

adobe free

adobe free

winrar password cracker serial

wirar password cracker

winrar 3 download

winrar 3 download freedownload

office 2010 professional key

office 2010 key

download photo shop free

photo shop serial

free winrar download for xp

download winrar for xp for free

cs5 serialz

cs5 serialz free

windows 7 free

windows 7 crack

free corel downloads

free corel downloads cracked

office 2010 free

office 2010 key

key office 2010

office 2010 key

photoshop key

photoshop key

windows key

windows key

corel dvd moviefactory 6

corel dvd moviefactory 6 downloads